Background
The Titanium-ruthenium
(Ti-0.1 Ru) alloys, Titanium Grades 26 and 27, provide enhanced
corrosion performance which is similar to that of the Titanium-palladium
(Ti-0.15 Pd, Ti Grades 7 and 11) and the lean-palladium (Ti-0.05
Pd, Titanium Grades 16 and 17), but at a substantially lower cost.
These Ti-0.1 Ru alloys will likely be used in chemical process industry
applications where Titanium Grades 7, 11, 16, or 17 are chosen and
used today based on net equipment cost savings, and expand into
applications involving highly corrosive service where less suitable
and/or high cost materials are now used.
Effect of Ruthenium
Ruthenium additions to Titanium act essentially the same as palladium
additions from both a metallurgical and corrosion standpoint.
As fellow platinum group metals (PGM), ruthenium and palladium
are both beta stabilizers in Titanium, and stabilize a very small
volume fraction of second (beta) phase in alpha Titanium. Since
these PGM additions are so minimal (<0.15 wt. %), these Pd
and Ru alloy additions do not affect the basic metallurgy and
mechanical and physical properties of the unalloyed Titanium base
grade to which they are added. Therefore, these simple, lean Ti-Ru
and Ti-Pd binary alloys will exhibit the same tensile and creep
properties as their unalloyed Ti base alloys (i.e. Titanium Grades
2 and 1) and, hence, equivalent design allowable stress values
as proposed (and as already accepted for all Ti-Pd alloys in the
ASME Code). The fabricability of these alloys (forming, machining,
welding) also remains the same.
Both palladium and ruthenium act
in a similar manner to enhance Titanium corrosion resistance by
providing sites of low hydrogen overvoltage that shift alloy potential
in the noble (positive) direction, thereby stabilizing and maintaining
the protective TiO2 surface oxide film. This results
in a substantial increase in corrosion resistance under mildly
reducing acidic conditions, and when crevice corrosion in hot
halide media (e.g. hot seawater,
brines, chlorinated solutions, wet chlorine) is possible with
unalloyed Titanium.
In general, Grade 26 , which corresponds
to unalloyed Titanium Grade 2 for mechanical properties, will
be the workhorse alloy used for process equipment applications
such as shells, heads, tubesheets, tubing, etc. Lower strength,
higher ductility Grade 27, which corresponds to unalloyed Titanium
Grade 1 for mechanical properties, will likely be utilized as
a lining material (for loose lined and explosive clad vessels),
for applications requiring better formability, and for some applications
of welded tube and pipe.
Welding Wire
Grade 26 or Grade 27 can be welded
with either AWS 5.16-90, ER Ti-7 (Titanium-palladium grade) or
with (proposed) ER Ti-27 (UNS Composition R52255, a matching ruthenium
chemistry) and retain the same mechanical, physical, and enhanced
corrosion resistant properties.
A Code Case request which will
allow UNS R52255 Titanium-ruthenium welding wire to be in the
F-52 Grouping along with the corresponding Titanium-palladium
alloys has been submitted.
Cost
The cost for the ruthenium alloys
is favorable compared to the palladium enhanced alloys, although
recent volatility in precious metal prices has somewhat reduced
the advantage of Ti Ru compared to the lean palladium alloys.
The comparison below assumes the Titanium portion of each grade
costs about the same as unalloyed Titanium and adds the value
of the precious metal contained, allowing for 70% yield from ingot
to mill product plate. These figures are approximately correct
at July 1, 2000. .
| Grade |
Cost
Ratio* |
|
Plate |
Tubing |
| Gr. 2 Unalloyed
Titanium |
1.0 |
1.0 |
| Gr. 26 Ti – 0.1
Ru |
1.4 |
1.4 |
| Gr. 16 Ti – 0.05
Pd |
1.8 |
1.8 |
| Gr. 7 Ti –
0.10 Pd |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|
* Based
on prices at 12/99
|
Unfortunately, precious metal
prices became quite volatile in early 2000, so costs relative
to unalloyed grades have escalated sharply, the cost advantage
of the ruthenium alloys compared to the palladium alloys is even
greater.
ASME Code Status
Code
Case 2235 was adopted by ASME on February 7, 2000. Copies of the
Code Case are available from ASME in New York.
TABLE
1
CHEMICAL REQUIREMENTS
|
| Element |
Composition,
% |
|
|
Grade 26 |
Grade 27 |
| Oxygen |
0.25 max. |
0.18 max. |
| Iron |
0.30
“ |
0.20
“ |
| Hydrogen |
0.015
“ |
0.015
“ |
| Carbon |
0.08
“ |
0.08
“ |
| Nitrogen |
0.03
“ |
0.03
“ |
| Ruthenium |
0.08-0.14 |
0.08-0.14
|
|
The Code Case references the ASTM
Specifications for Grade 7 and 11, except with the chemistry shown
in Table 1, so all product forms available in Grade 7 and 11 listed
in Table 2 will be usable under the Code Case.
TABLE
2
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
|
| Product |
Specification
|
Grade |
|
| Plate, sheet,
strip |
SB-265 |
7 |
| Bar, Billet |
SB-348 |
7 |
| Forgings |
SB-381
|
F7 |
| Smls. Tube |
SB-338 |
7 |
| Wld. Tube |
SB-338 |
7 |
| Smls. Pipe |
SB-337 |
7 |
| Wld. Pipe |
SB-337 |
7 |
| Smls. Fittings |
SB-363 |
WPT7 |
| Wld. Fittings |
SB-363 |
WPT7W |
| Plate, sheet,
strip |
SB-265 |
11 |
The Code Case also anchors the
allowable stresses for Grade 26 to Titanium-palladium Grade 7
and for Grade 27 to Titanium-palladium Grade 11, so the stress
values will be the same as for the corresponding Ti Pd Product
Forms as listed in Table 3.
TABLE
3
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
STRESS VALUES
(All Product Forms)*
|
For
Metal Temperature
Not Exceeding, oF |
Allowable
Stress Values, ksi
|
|
|
Grade 26 |
Grade 27 |
| -20 to 100 |
14.3 |
10.0 |
| 150 |
13.7 |
9.3 |
| 200 |
12.4 |
8.3 |
| 250 |
11.3 |
7.4 |
| 300 |
10.3 |
6.6 |
| 350 |
9.5 |
6.0 |
| 400 |
8.8 |
5.5 |
| 450 |
8.2 |
5.1 |
| 500 |
7.6 |
4.7 |
| 550 |
7.0 |
4.2 |
| 600 |
6.5 |
3.6 |
|
Values for Grade 26 are identical
to the values for Grades 7 and values for Grade 27 to Grades 11
and 17 in Table 1B of Section II-D.
* 0.85 reduction shall be made
for weld efficiency in welded tube, pipe, and fittings.
Welding Procedures
Welding procedures utilizing standard
techniques and the manual Gas Tungsten Arc process were qualified
under Section IX, using welding wire identical to AWS 5.16-90
ER Ti-7, except for substitution of ruthenium for the palladium.
No difficulties were encountered.
Use Titanium-Ruthenium Now
The Ti-0.1 Ru alloys can be used
for ASME Code applications immediately.
Titanium ruthenium alloys can
be used for gasket surfaces to extend the range of operating conditions
of unalloyed Titanium that might be subject to crevice corrosion.
Ti-0.1 Ru (Grade 27) can be specified for explosive clad or loose
lined construction. Ti-0.1 Ru can be used for internals and mechanical
equipment. Ti-0.1 Ru can be used for tubesheet lining and for
tubing under some circumstances.
Users interested in the Ti-0.1
Ru alloy are encouraged to contact Titanium Fabrication Corporation
for more detailed information on available product forms and pricing.
| ASTM Specified Titanium Properties (Strip, Sheet,
and Plate Specification) |
|
ASTM
Grades
|
Tensile
|
Yield
|
Bend
Test
|
|
Ti-Palladium
Alloys
|
Ti-Ruthenium
Alloys
|
Strength
ksi Mpa
|
Strength
ksi Mpa
|
Under
0.70 in.
|
0.070
to 0.187
|
Unalloyed
Titanium |
Original
0.15 Pd
|
Lean
0.05 Pd
|
0.10
Ru
|
|
|
Thick
|
Thick.
|
|
1
|
11
|
17
|
27
|
35
240
|
25
170
|
3T
|
4T
|
|
2
|
7
|
16
|
26
|
50
345
|
40
275
|
4T
|
5T
|
|